Friday, January 25, 2019

Change


Why do we have the propensity to hear the word change and our hackles go up? The most common bathroom picture I see...well at least in my own bathroom, is the quote "the only thing constant is change." So why was Heraclitus, this pioneer of wisdom, at such peace with this expression and some of us are not?


Success with a new way of doing anything in life comes with the price of self-doubt and perhaps the feelings of whether or not the change even needs to happen. What is in it for me? This is usually one of the first things we ask ourselves. Personal and professional change is experienced by everyone.
Is there a predictable pattern to the feelings and perceptions that people have as a change process unfolds? Are we aware of our own mindset when it comes to change?

I wish I had a 6 step guide to making any change a success. If you were thinking this blog was going to come up with an answer, then I have clearly failed you. What I have come to realize and accept is that change is a major player in all of our lives. It is our choice of how we respond to it, that makes or breaks the success and the emotional feelings we have attached to that change. With strong teams working together we truly can accomplish much. Trust yourself first. Trust others second. Embrace change when it has the potential to be better than the current state.


Thursday, January 24, 2019

Conferring With Intention: Why, When, and How



WHY
According to the blogpost The Goals of Conferring in Mathematics, “Conferring is the practice of talking with students as they engage in meaningful work with the purpose of uncovering their thinking and supporting learning in the moment.” The goal is to find out what students know, decide what they need to learn next, and scaffold instruction accordingly. Brain-based education supports the goal of students working in their Zone of Proximal Development. Conferring provides the opportunity to bring out targeted instruction right when it’s needed.

WHEN
Conferring Within a Math Workshop Framework
The teacher normally meets with 2-3 small groups during the Math Workshop. If the teacher meets with 2 groups, there can be time allotted for conferring with some students. During this conferring, which could be with an individual student or with two, the teacher is prepared to talk with the student about a specific goal that has been identified either by the student or the teacher. There is intentional nudging to grow the student’s understanding.

Conferring Within a Math Problem Solving Framework
This occurs after students have been given a rich problem solving task. They may be working in groups of 2, 3, or 4. The teacher approaches the group with the purpose of eliciting student thinking. According to Jen Munson in her book In the Moment, the teacher asks probing questions about the work, looking for:

  • Surprising or original thinking
  • Different components of the work and the connections between these parts
  • Potential misconceptions
  • Gaps in the students’ explanation of what they did
  • Organization of their work

The teacher’s goal is not to tell the students how to solve the problem, but rather ask questions that will keep the students actively involved in the task.

Conferring Within Personalized Learning Units of Study
Some math units lend themselves more toward a personalized learning approach, particularly where students are working on skills at several different levels. Conferring in these units might be where the students are able to show the artifacts of their understanding. The teacher listens for deep understanding as the student explains her work toward her personal goal. Students may sign up for a conference with the teacher to share these artifacts, or for help understanding a concept. There is great student ownership during these personalized learning units, where students have a heightened awareness of their understanding, and can take steps to further their learning.

Conferring for Reteaching
A teacher who takes anecdotal notes during small group instruction and conferring will be able to analyze where specific students need better understanding of concepts. If there are 1-3 students who have not yet achieved mastery of a critical skill, the teacher may decide to move ahead with the next unit, making time to confer with these few students who need more teacher time. Their goals are specific to the concepts they need to master. The conferring time is highly focused.

HOWEliciting and Interpreting Student Thinking
A conference begins with a probing question that isn’t too general. For example, asking “How is it going?” will almost always be answered with one word, “Good.” This doesn’t give the teacher much insight. Instead, students can be asked to share their thinking with various prompts, such as, “What are you working on? Tell me about your thinking. How did you get started? What are you trying?” These all invite students to share work in progress. This leads to other probing questions to uncover student understanding and give students the opportunity to justify and deepen their thinking. It moves the conferring from talking about a particular task to talking about concepts.

For more on Conferring in the Math Classroom, try this Podcast by Jen Munson, author of In the Moment.

February 2019 TDP Registration!

Hello Everyone,

Please see February 2019 TDP courses offered and the link below for registration:


All courses are held on February 5, 12, 19 and 26 from 4:00 - 6:00 p.m. unless noted otherwise.
  • Flexible Grouping: Data-Driven Instruction
  • Math Workshop Revisited
  • Conferring with Readers and Writers
  • AVMR Course 1 Revisited
  • SCERTS Framework

Registration will close at 12pm on Friday, February 1st.

*************

There are also Self-paced TDP courses available on BB9. You can register for those classes at any time through this link:  http://goo.gl/VkW76t
  • BB101
  • BB102
  • BB103
  • Google 101
  • Google 102
  • Google 103
  • SAMR 101
  • Literacy Foundations
  • Math Foundations
  • Standards Based Grading
  • Understanding Educator Effectiveness
Thank you!

Friday, January 18, 2019

Building On Readers’ Strengths


Building On Readers’ Strengths

“Instead of assessing to find what the student can’t do, and then teaching to a deficit, I find what the student is already able to do and I teach to move the student, always linking the new information with what is known.” -Jennifer Serravallo, Teaching Reading in Small Groups, p. 10

At Hawthorne LAB School, thinking about a reader’s strengths isn’t just something we think is a good idea - it’s one of the core beliefs that defines our team.  The “B” in LAB stands for Build On Strengths. This year we are focused on increasing academic achievement by growing our practices connected to small group instruction. Both small group instruction and building on learners’ strengths are at the core of our Theory of Action.
How are teachers thinking about readers and their strengths at Hawthorne LAB? Here are a few ways…



Analysis of Running Records - Is the reader using one or a combination of meaning, syntax, or visual information at the point of error? What strategic behaviors is the reader using if/when he/she self-corrects?


Intentional Planning for Small Groups - Using what we notice from our anecdotal notes from small groups/conferring, as well as the information we get from running record analysis to intentionally plan next steps that build on what our readers are showing they already have control of.


Reading Conferences - Observing and noticing what the reader is doing, giving the reader specific positive feedback on what the reader is doing well.

SDW Reading Continuums - Using this tool to highlight where students are at, based on what they are already able to do, and what their next instructional steps are.


Collaboration with Specialists - Classroom teachers, special ed. teachers, interventionists and specialists collaborate around student strengths and share instructional strategies to promote transfer for our readers.





As we meet with readers in our literacy classrooms,
let’s consider the following questions:

What is my student showing me he/she can already do?

Where is the student at with his/her learning of ________?

How can I build on what the student already knows?

What is my next instructional step based on what I know this student is able to do?

How can I use my anecdotal notes/running records to intentionally plan instructional next steps for my readers?

Does my feedback help the reader notice and name strategies he/she is able to use independently?


Friday, January 11, 2019

Determining Importance: Math Skills & Fluency or Problem Solving?

Determining Importance: Math Skills & Fluency or Problem Solving?

Some educators believe that students need to be solid on math skills and fluency prior to approaching problem solving, while others believe that they can be learned simultaneously.  What is the best approach? Elementary students in Waukesha spend about six weeks a year learning via Fosnot problem solving units, which reinforces our belief that conceptual understanding comes by engaging students in rich problem solving tasks that lead them to conceptual understanding.  The reflection portion of those lessons, or math congress, is a powerful tool in which teachers guide students to share their strategies and solidify their new understandings. This model of working concurrently on problem solving and skills & fluency is carried out through the rest of our math curriculum as well.






There is a plethora of research which supports this instructional model.  In Mathematical Mindsets author Jo Boaler writes: 

“When students see math as a series of short questions, they cannot see the role for their own inner growth and learning. They think that math is a fixed set of methods that either they get or they don’t. But when students see math as a broad landscape of unexplored puzzles in which they can wander around, asking questions and thinking about relationships, they understand that their role is thinking, sense making, and growing. When students see mathematics as a set of ideas and relationships, and their role as one of thinking about the ideas and making sense of them, they have a mathematical mindset.”

In Mind/Shift’s post “What if Teachers Took Computation Out of Math Class?” mathematician Conrad Wolfram argues that math can be broken down into four steps:

  1. Pose the right question about an issue
  2. Change that real world solution into a math formula
  3. Compute
  4. Take the math formulation and turn it back into a real world scenario to verify it

Wolfram argues that most math instruction in our country focuses on Step 3, Computation, which is the only step that can be automated.  Instead, he and Jo Boaler agree that the focus needs to be on greater conceptual understanding of mathematics.

Perhaps you need a real world example of why we need to focus on both problem solving and skills & fluency.  I recently had a conversation with a relative who is a manager in the food service industry. He told me that on a daily basis he is approached by employees with mathematical questions.  The nature of these queries are never computational, as everyone carries a calculator (cell phone) in their pockets. Instead, he said they frequently struggle with setting up problems such as:

96 buns were ordered and buns come 6 to a package.  How many packages of buns do I need to send to that cafe?  

It’s a bit shocking that adults are unable to set up routine math problems.  This illustrates the need to build conceptual understanding by working on problem solving and skills & fluency concurrently.

But how do we get students to move in this direction?  One method is Numberless Word Problems.  If you get frustrated when you carefully craft or choose a rich problem-solving task, and the first thing your students do is take the problem’s numbers and start plugging them into algorithms without first trying to understand what the problem is asking, then you need to give this a try.  It may initially seem counterintuitive, but one way to mitigate this student practice is to have them tackle word problems without numbers. Numberless word problems are a scaffold which allows students to concentrate on the structure of word problems without worrying about computation. Don’t worry, that step will come later in the process!

Here is an excerpt of a class session tackling a Numberless Word Problem from the blog Numberless Word Problems, which has a vast array of resources.  The teacher begins by presenting the problem:

Some girls entered a school art competition. Fewer boys than girls entered the competition.

She projected her screen and asked, “What math do you see in this problem?”...

“There isn’t any math. There aren’t any numbers.”

She smiles. “Sure there’s math here. Read it again and think about it.”

Finally a kid exclaims, “Oh! There are some girls. That means it’s an amount!”...

“And there were some boys, too. Fewer boys than girls,” another child adds.

When it seems like the students are ready, she makes a new slide that says:

135 girls entered a school art competition. Fewer boys than girls entered the competition.

Acting very curious, she asks, “Hmm, does this change what we know at all?”...

This is where the class starts a lively debate about how many boys there could be. At first the class thinks it could be any number from 0 up to 134. But then some students start saying that it can’t be 0 because that would mean no boys entered the competition. Since it says fewer boys than girls, they take that to mean that at least 1 boy entered the competition. This is when another student points out that actually the number needs to be at least 2 because it says boys and that is a plural noun.

Stop for a moment. Look at all this great conversation and math reasoning from a class that moments before was mindlessly adding all the numbers they could find in a word problem?

Once the class finishes their debate about the possible range for the number of boys, my co-worker shows them a slide that says:

135 girls entered a school art competition. Fifteen fewer boys than girls entered the competition.

“What new information do you see? How does it change your understanding of the situation?”...

Even though most students anticipated the final question to be: , “How many boys entered the art competition?”, the teacher instead asked: “How many children entered the art competition?”



 

Of course I am not proposing that you approach every math problem in this manner,  But, if you are looking for a novel way to encourage your students to think deeply about the math problems they approach, you might want to give Numberless Word problems a try in your classroom.

*In addition to the resource listed above, you can learn more about Numberless Word Problems on Twitter by using the hashtag  #numberlesswp.

Thursday, January 10, 2019

Puzzling . . .


There’s a problem in my realm.  It’s not going away.  It was there on Monday.  And it was still there when I looked in its direction today.  It seems it won’t go away.  I will have to deal with it.  The approach is not obvious.  Really, I have no idea what to do.  I think there is much to know below the surface, but I haven’t been brave enough to invest my time in it. 

If I’m going to make change - really meaningful change, I need a thoughtful approach to this.  I need to look at the problem and reveal the deeper layers.  “If this is what the surface view shows, what do I find if I ask some questions?”

This is the fundamental thinking in getting to the root cause of a problem.  We need to invest this kind of effort in a variety of contexts - a student who is always surly, a teacher who feels defeated, a parent who is dissatisfied.  As the person responsible for supporting others and for increasing student achievement I need to have a way to get to the source of the issue so I can make an adjustment that will have a meaningful impact.  

Root Cause Analysis is an approach we can use in any problem solving situation. . . 
Why is the circuit breaker for my outdoor lights flipping off repeatedly? 
Why is the reading achievement of my students with special needs not improving?
Why are students getting hurt on the playground?

We have practiced and applied root cause analysis over the years and this mid-year point seems like a good time to review.  We all need to refresh and consider where we are at in our goals for the current school year and also to get a handle on the problems to be solved in the year ahead.  

The BEST example of asking why until you get to the root cause is portrayed in the Jefferson Memorial example in this video - please watch!  And consider how the problem solvers in this case revealed a great deal of unknown information by employing the question, ‘Why?'
Enjoy and be inspired!







Friday, January 4, 2019

The Impact of Social-Emotional Learning

The National Education Foundation defines social-emotional learning (SEL) as "the process through which children and adults acquire and effectively apply the knowledge, attitudes, and skills necessary to understand and manage emotions, establish and achieve positive goals, feel and show empathy for others, establish and maintain positive relationships and make responsible decisions." As we reflect on the growing needs of our students surrounding mental health, regulation of emotions, overall behavior, etc., it becomes clear that focusing on academics alone will not prepare students for the demands of post-secondary life and adulthood. As a system and at all grade levels, we must also reach the competencies outside of academic content knowledge, which are increasingly necessary to succeed in college and in careers. This is where universal SEL comes into play. The following are research-based outcomes that have resulted in districts across the nation as a result of implementing an evidence-based, universal SEL curriculum: 


  • Reduction in discipline referrals
  • Increase in social competence
  • Significant reductions in aggressive behaviors
  • Increase in positive goal setting 
  • Increase in prosocial behavior
  • Reductions in bullying
  • Reductions in substance abuse
  • Lower levels of depression and anxiety
  • Increased grades and attendance
  • Increase in social and emotional regulation
SDW has made great strides in our delivery of SEL at the elementary level. All 14 of our elementary schools have updated Second Step curriculums, which has one of the strongest SEL research bases when it comes to positive student outcomes. You can learn more about the Second Step program and it's research base here. Additionally, we are excited to be expanding this universal SEL to all middle schools in the 2019-2020 school year.

Lastly, the state continues to highlight and emphasized the importance of SEL throughout WI schools. Last year, the DPI released the following SEL Competencies, which span early childhood through adulthood. I encourage you to take a look at them as there are countless opportunities to "hit" many of these competencies in any content area or course we teach in SDW! As we move towards increased attention to SEL for all staff and students, we will continue to create a sense of safety and respect grounded in the social and emotional health and well being of our entire school community. This is something that, in many schools, is a difference you can feel the second you walk through the front doors.

Thursday, January 3, 2019

Making a Student’s Mathematical Thinking Visible

How can we support students in making their thinking visible and how is this connected to a student’s success? As explained in Visible Thinking in the K-8 Mathematics Classroom, “True mathematical learning requires visible thinking. Research shows that, in the mathematics classroom, visible thinking is the key to mathematics learning and success. Evidence of visible thinking is apparent during mathematical discussions, explanations, demonstrations, drawing, writing, and other ways that ideas are conveyed.”

Supporting and scaffolding visible thinking in a math classroom with routines will shift student focus from procedures to conceptual understanding of the content being taught. With visual routines students learn how to organize their ideas, clarify thoughts, and frame their thinking to clearly share mathematical learning with their classmates. Providing students with tools to share their ideas strengthens problem solving skills, encourages deeper thinking, and increases equity in the learning of mathematics.

Figure 1. Table of Visible Thinking: Purposes and Effects for Students. Reprinted from Visible Thinking in the K–8 Mathematics Classroom, by Ted H. Hull, Don S. Balka and Ruth Harbin Miles, 2011, retrieved from https://us.corwin.com/sites/default/files/upm-binaries/41035_Chapter_1.pdf.

Visible Thinking, by Project Zero offers routines to develop Visible Thinking through the use of Thinking Routines in the classroom. These routines are used to promote meaningful collaboration and deepen student understanding. Below are a few examples of useful routines you can use in your math classroom.

Scaffolds such as See Think Wonder support students to show their thinking. This is a routine that gives a framework to promote student inquiry and wonder. This routine can be done whole group, small group, or independently. Students can quietly wonder in their math journals and then share their wonders whole group. A teacher documents ideas on an anchor chart to for students to reference throughout a lesson. 3 Act Math Tasks and Visual Patterns are two great resources to use with this type of routine.

Meaningful Collaboration can be supported by routines such as, Claim-Support-Question. This routine guides students in explaining or justifying their thinking. Collaboration routines are designed to help students develop, nurture, and reflect on good conversations that support learning. Being able to have conversations with their peers allows students to borrow ideas from others to make their claim/understanding stronger. This routine could be used while learning new vocabulary or mathematical concepts.

Think Pair Share and Connect Extend Challenge are two routines that support students in making connections to  prior learning and the ideas of others. A deeper understanding is fostered with intentional planning around grouping and partnering of students, facilitating  a wide range of thinking. Connect Extend Challenge also creates a space for students to think about their challenges and encourages productive struggle.

Visible thinking allows students to share and communicate their thoughts verbally and in written form. Through conversations and collaboration students are actively clarifying and extending their own ideas giving all students a voice. As you prepare for the new year, what scaffolds and visual routines will you try?

Wednesday, January 2, 2019

Need an Introduction to English Learners? Join TDP Success for ALLs.

Join the Success for ALLs TDP to learn about Language Learning, Language Learners and what you can do in your instruction to increase the effectiveness of your teaching and student learning.


Happy New Year!

Have you wondered why some students might struggle with what you are teaching in math, science, social studies, English, or any of the other subject areas in school? Have you thought about how you address language through your content?

I will be leading a TDP on the topic around, Why we are ALLs (academic language learners). This TDP starts next week on Tuesday! We will focus on how to support ALLs through.. 


  • Embedding strategies into our everyday practice
  • Analyzing academic language demands
  • Engaging across all domains of language
  • Differentiating supports to teach high complex tasks

Please reach out with any specific questions if you might have about our learning.

January 2019 TDP Registration - click here